Download AGM Minutes in PDF Format
Attendees
Jeffrey Boardman – Chair (non-voting)
Peter Farr – Fixtures (non-voting)
Mark Attree – Secretary (non-voting)
Matthew Britnell – Lewes (non-voting)
Jonathan Britnell – Lewes
Alex Taylor –Collyers
Brian Stockham - Uckfield
Jim Wheeler – Hastings
Robert Wall – East Grinstead / Treasurer
David Fryer – Webmaster/Crowborough
James Mansson – Horsham
Roger Waddingham - Horsham
Colin Clark - Eastbourne
Chris Baldry – Haywards Heath
Viv Cole – Haywards Heath
Luke Rutherford – Brighton and Hove
Paul Batchelor- Brighton and Hove
Chris Jones – Worthing
Peter Larwood – Worthing
Sue Forde- Bexhill
Bill Tracey- Bexhill
1. Chairman’s Opening Remarks and Apologies for Absence
Mark Attree opened the meeting, apologies had been received prior to the meeting from John Pye,
East Grinstead Bookshop. A brief period of reflection was held for Doug Stevenson, long serving
Chairman and Treasurer of the League and other chess friends and opponents we have lost during
the last year. Jeffrey Boardman introduced himself to the meeting, expressing his gratitude that so
many were attending the meeting and expecting that the discussions would be held in a good spirit.
2. Minutes of Last Year’s AGM
The Minutes were approved without comment.
3. Secretary’s Report and Matters Arising
The location of the Rapidplay Trophy remains unknown. It was agreed that a new trophy should be
purchased, with Crowborough Chess Club offering to contribute, whilst other trophies will need to
be replaced in the next year or two.
4. Treasurers Report and Matters Arising
Robert Wall stated that he was in the process of assuming control of the accounts and no accounts
were available at present. The bank statements included a number of payments, but there was
currently no way of knowing which clubs had made the payments. The League was being charged a
monthly fee by the bank, and statements indicated a current balance of +-£400. There was currently
an ECF Game Fee payment for +-£60 outstanding. This would be passed on to the relevant clubs and
it was proposed that a reminder be sent to all clubs regarding this season’s game fee payments,
which could be avoided by individuals joining the ECF by end June. Brian Stockham suggested that a
list of Club Treasurers should be made for the use of the League’s Treasurer. A start was made on
this with a request for those present at the meeting to supply names and email addresses if known.
A number of expenditures would soon be required, principally engraving of trophies and within a
couple of years new trophies might be required, so avoiding unnecessary expenditure such as bank
fee payments would be a priority.
5. Fixture Secretary’s Report and Matters Arising
Peter Farr informed the meeting that the League had returned to it’s normal format this season,
with three divisions of ten teams. He thanked team captains for their flexibility in re-arranging
fixtures though one or two re-arrangements had pushed the limits of what was acceptable. There
had been no board defaults and no contested adjudications in the adult league.
Winners of the various competitions were;
Division 1 – 1st Brighton and Hove 1
Division 2 - 1st Haywards Heath 1
Division 3 – 1st Bexhill 3
Rapidplay Division – 1st East Grinstead Bookshop 2
Knockout Trophy - Lewes
6. Tournament Controllers Report and Matters Arising
There had been no disputes or controversies requiring intervention beyond some nomination issues.
7. Presentation of Trophies
Division 1 Trophy was received by Luke Rutherford of Brighton and Hove.
Division 2 Trophy was received by Viv Cole of Haywards Heath
Division 3 Trophy was not returned last year for presentation (there had not been a 3rd Division).
Robert Wall was tasked with ascertaining it’s location.
The Knockout Trophy was received by Jonathan Britnell of Lewes.
Rapidplay Division Trophy was not available for presentation.
The question of paying for engraving was considered. Normally the League re-imburses clubs for the
costs of engraving, but several clubs indicated that they did not re-charge this (others did). The
proposal that clubs pay for their own engraving had been rejected a few years ago according to
Matthew Britnell, this proposal should be considered again.
The tankards for Overall performance;
Division 1, Division 2 were presented. The trophy for Division
3 was not available, but then neither was the person who had won it.
Overall Tankard was received by Vivian Cole on behalf of Felix Kwiatkowski.
Division 1 Tankard was received by Luke Rutherford.
Division 2 Tankard was received by Vivian Cole on behalf of Felix Kwiatkowski.
Division 3 Tankard was not available for presentation to the winner John Pye, but Robert Wall is
recorded as having it. He undertook to look for it.
8. Election of Officers
Current officers were re-elected on a show of hands with thanks to David Fryer for the website.
9. County Adjudication Secretary’s Report and Matters Arising
Although there had been no formal adjudications required in this last season there was in fact no
County Adjudication Secretary at present and a route for adjudications was not clear. Luke
Rutherford stated that the process lies with the County Association but until this is clarified the
League should specify an interim solution, Peter Farr to consider. David Fryer mentioned an incident
involving a Junior where in the absence of support at the time it was felt that a younger player had
been pressured into agreeing a result at the board rather than having recourse to adjudication, so
the process of ending a game on the night needs to be made clear.
10. SCCA Matters relating to the League (and ECF)
Luke Rutherford updated the meeting.
Peter Farr informed the meeting that the ECF was considering changing it’s levels of membership.
11a. Proposed Rule Change – Team Size
Currently
Five-board matches shall normally be played in all divisions, but for season
2022-23 four-board matches shall be played in all divisions.
Proposed
1. Four-board matches shall be played in all divisions.
Or, alternatively
2. Five-board matches shall normally be played in all divisions, but four-board matches shall
be continued in all divisions for season 2023-24. (NOT DISCUSSED FOLLOWING
APPROVAL OF 1.)
There is a further proposal that should be treated separately in case of 4 boards being
approved.
3. If both teams agree to a fifth board, or more, then these can be submitted directly for
grading by the Home team but do not affect the match outcome. (WITHDRAWN AFTER
DISCUSSION)
11a.1. Both sides made points on this change. The argument for 4 Boards was principally about the
ease of travel, where a non-playing driver could actually take an entire team, very useful for teams
made up largely of Junior players. The point was also made that in some clubs this made an
additional team possible eg Bexhill. Conversely for some clubs it denied players the opportunity of
taking part eg Lewes, where 2 teams of 4 may not be possible whilst one team of 5 definitely is. Luke
Rutherford pointed out that the League had 6 Boards at one time, then reduced to 5, now 4, which
makes the matches less substantial, also the view of Roger Waddingham. Colin Clark’s view was
that 4 Board teams had worked well and had given lots of new players matches, though he could see
the argument for 5 Boards in the First Division.
Approved, 15 for, 9 against.
11a.3. The proposal for extra optional boards was discussed. Practically it appeared to be possible to
do this, with extra rated games, within the ECF-LMS system, but there was no reason the clubs could
not do this without the involvement of the League. Peter Larwood withdrew the proposal on this
basis.
11b. Proposed Rule Change – Team Order
Currently
In each match, a team must play in descending order of current playing strength. It is
recognised that, for many reasons, a player's grading may not be the best guide to current
form, and considerable discretion is allowed a team captain in this area. Nevertheless, the
Tournament Controller may require a team captain to justify his team order, and, should
he/she be satisfied that the provisions of this rule have been clearly disregarded to
the detriment of the opposing team, he/she shall refer the matter to the Management
Committee who may adjust the match result as seems appropriate
Proposed
In each match, a team must play in descending order of current playing strength. It is
recognised that, for many reasons, a player's rating may not be the best guide to current
form, and considerable discretion is allowed a team captain in this area. Nevertheless, for K ratings players should play in order of decreasing rating, subject to an allowable difference of 75
rating points. For P-ratings the Tournament Controller may require a team captain to justify his
team order, and, should he/she be satisfied that the provisions of this rule have been clearly
disregarded to the detriment of the opposing team, he/she shall refer the matter to the
Management Committee who may adjust the match result as seems appropriate.
Views both for and against making a formal rating limit that needs to be followed were expressed.
Firstly, it was considered that some clarity in the rule might be required as too much is left to
‘discretion’, both as guidance to team captains and something against which changes might be judged.
It was noted that there had been several instances where the ratings listed next to player’s names were
clearly not in descending board order and this had caused concern with several clubs. David Fryer (as
the ratings officer) explained that any P-rating was extremely unreliable and that K-ratings (which
required 10 games) were often also unreliable since in many cases that rating would be based on
games against players with P-Ratings. In response to a question from Brian Stockham, Peter Farr
confirmed that the Management Committee had not investigated any instances and that no formal
complaint or concern had been raised with the committee during the season though they had become
aware of it through informal discussions. An amendment for extending the proposed limit to 100 points
was proposed by Alex Taylor and seconded by Brian Stockham as the proposed 75 point limit was
itself arbitrary. On David Fryers advice, the ‘Official Revised Monthly Rating’ should be the rating used
within this rule, this amendment was approved as was the replacement of the word ‘considerable’ with
‘reasonable’ after a discussion regarding whether any qualifier was required atall.
Amended proposal as follows;
In each match, a team must play in descending order of current playing strength. It is
recognised that, for many reasons, a player's rating may not be the best guide to current
form, and reasonable discretion is allowed a team captain in this area. Nevertheless, for Kratings players should play in order of decreasing rating, subject to an allowable difference of 100
rating points*. For P-ratings the Tournament Controller may require a team captain to justify his
team order, and, should he/she be satisfied that the provisions of this rule have been clearly
disregarded to the detriment of the opposing team, he/she shall refer the matter to the
Management Committee who may adjust the match result as seems appropriate.
Where * is the Official Revised Monthly Rating set by the ECF for each player.
Approved 20 for, 0 against.
11c Proposed Change - Name of the League
That the ‘Mid Sussex Chess League’ be renamed the ‘Sussex Chess
League’
Peter Farr introduced the proposal. The League had expanded geographically from it’s original area
and now encompassed all of Sussex except those other clubs in West Sussex that play rated games
(specifically Bognur & Arun and Chichester). It may be a matter of fact already since those clubs may
apply to join the League anyway but for distance of travel reasons play in the Portsmouth and District
League instead. Luke Rutherford mentioned that in simple terms ‘Sussex League Champions’ is a
better sounding title. The possible need for structural change (eg East and West Divisions- David
Fryer) to avoid excessive travel could be handled when it became an issue since those clubs were in
the same position as Hastings, who play in both Sussex and Kent Leagues - David Graham. Brian
Stockham considered that Mid Sussex was an antiquated term and that the reality is that this is in
effect a Sussex League.
David Fryer raised the issue of the relationship of the renamed League to the SCCA and whether this
could be considered a first step towards a merger of the two. Peter Farr stated that this might be a
possibility but that it would require a lot more discussion. Practical issues regarding the name change
were also brought up..bank account, trophies, web site for example.
Jeffrey Boardman proposed a vote be taken.
Approved 19 for, 0 against.
12. Any Other Business
Matthew Britnell mentioned that the meeting needed to decide on a proposed location for the next
meeting. The Secretary agreed to address this with the current hosts.
Meeting closed at 9.55 pm.
Team Nominations October 2023
Bexhill 1 - Mark Rich, Andrew Fleming, Anh Nguyen
Bexhill 2 - Janis Petersons, Leo Woning, Steve Blewitt
Bexhill 3- William Luxton, Steve Merchant, Bill Tracey
Brighton & Hove 1 - Luke Rutherford, Callum Brewer, Geoffrey James
Brighton & Hove 2 - Kit Blades, Ian Kelly, Chris Lake
Crowborough 1 - Arjun Kolani, David Fryer, Jon Lawrance
Eastbourne 1 - Maks Rozman, Rasa Norinkeviciute, Oli Froom,
Eastbourne 2 - Adrian Pickersgill, Jim O'Dell, Laurence Butt
Eastbourne 3 - Mick Reddie, Paul Carpenter, Matt Pannett
Eastbourne 4 - Anthony Giles, Dejan Lekic, Colin Clark
East Grinstead 1 - Chris Baker, Peter Kemp, Carlos Cambon
East Grinstead Bookshop 1 - t.b.a.
Hastings & St.Leonards 1 - Daniel Lowe, Francis Rayner, John Sugden
Hastings & St.Leonards 2 - Brendan Ruane, Henry Cove, Mark Brougham
Haywards Heath 1 - Feliks Kwiatkowski, Jeffrey Boardman, Viv Cole
Haywards Heath 2 - Julian Clark, Graham Ewens, Lucas Renshaw
Horsham 1 - Gavin Lock, Mark Broom, Michael Forster
Horsham 2 - James Mansson, Anthony Higgs, Phil Stimpson
Horsham 3 - Peter Harbott, Ian Comley, Roy Page
Horsham 4 - Chris Heath, Bob Lanzer, Robert McDonald
Worthing 1 - Russell Granat, Matthew Payne, Chris Jones
Download League Rules in PDF format
Operative from September 2023 for season 2023-24 only
1 League structure
1.1 Membership
Membership of the league shall be open to all clubs in Sussex. Member clubs may enter one or more teams
in the annual competition, subject to any maximum imposed from time to time on the number permitted.
1.2 Organisation
The league shall be organised in divisions, the size and number of which shall be periodically reviewed
at the league AGM with the aspiration that the first division should have 11 teams. This should take
into account the impact on other divisions.
1.3 Promotion & relegation
From season to season, promotion and relegation shall operate on a two-up, two-down basis across all
divisions. Each team that wins promotion must take their place in the higher division next season, with the
exception of the team placed second in the second division, who may decline promotion provided that the
next-to-bottom team in the first division agrees not to be relegated. Should this option be exercised, only
one team shall be demoted from the first division. Other adjustments may also be made by the
Management Committee from time to time as teams enter or withdraw from the League.
1.4 New teams
New teams shall start in one of the lowest two divisions.
2 Arrangements for the playing season
2.1 Season
The season will commence with the distribution of Fixture Lists in accordance with rule 2.5. All matches,
other than additional matches [see rule 12], should be completed by 14th May, unless permission has been
obtained from the Fixtures Secretary to play the game at a later date.
2.2 Entries
Team applications must be submitted by 14 September. League entry fees must be submitted concurrent
with the Team Entry Application in order for teams to be included in the Fixtures List. Clubs must also pay
any non-ECF members game fee incurred within 14 days of being invoiced by the League. Payment shall
be by cheque unless a BACS transfer is arranged in advance with the Treasurer.
2.3 Venues
Unless otherwise agreed at the AGM, half of each team's matches shall be played at home, and the
other half away. If a club does not wish to travel for an away match, it may ask for the match to be
played at a "half-way- house" venue and it shall then be responsible for all arrangements and costs.
2.4 Fixtures
Each team shall play one match against every other team in its division. If a club has two or more teams in
the same division, then these teams must play the match or matches between them before playing any
other matches.
2.5 Fixture lists
The Fixtures Secretary shall circulate to all teams by 28th September the Fixtures List for the season
with the initial matches set for mid October. This will take into account up to 15 dates a team does not
wish to play on as specified in the Team Application Form.
2.6 Fixture changes
Upon receipt of the fixture lists, clubs should check their viability. Changes may be made (including mutually
agreed weekend arrangements):
• by mutual agreement concluded up to 14 days after the date of issue of the fixture lists for matches scheduled
to be played in October or November; or
• by mutual agreement concluded 28 days prior to the originally scheduled date for matches scheduled to be
played in December or later; or
• under exceptional circumstances.
All fixture changes, and any resulting disputes, must be notified by both clubs within 7 days to the Fixtures
Secretary. Failure to do so will incur 4 default points (see 6.1). The Management Committee shall consider
the circumstances and may default any team found to have changed or withdrawn from a fixture otherwise
than in accordance with this rule.
3 Eligibility of players
3.1 Eligibility for a team
To be eligible to play in a team, a player must comply with at least 2 of the following criteria:
1. Payment of a current season annual subscription to the club
2. Having their main residence or place of work /education within the County of Sussex (East or West)
3. Having their main residence within 20 miles outside of the East / West Sussex county boundary
4. Having played at least one full season in an internal club competition in the previous few years; i.e. played
and completed the full schedule
5. Having played at least 40% of matches for the club in two previous MSL seasons in the previous five years
6. Birth in Sussex
A new team member will be deemed ineligible unless the club has furnished to the Tournament Controller
proof of which two rules they qualify under before or concurrent with the submission of the match result
[rule 10.2]
If it is not the club's first team, restrictions concerning nominated players also apply [rule 4].
3.2 Eligibility after changing clubs
A player may change clubs within the league once during the season provided that he/she has played
fewer than five matches for his/her original club.
3.3 Monitoring eligibility
3.3.1 The eligibility of a player for a particular team appearance may be formally questioned by the opposing
team captain to the Tournament Controller, who will investigate that eligibility, together with the
Management Committee, and will communicate their decision to all affected parties.
3.3.2 Eligibility may also be questioned by the Tournament Controller or Fixtures Secretary, who shall act as
above.
3.3.3 The Tournament Controller shall continually monitor the eligibility of all players. If any player plays for two
clubs in any season, the Tournament Controller shall inform both clubs of this occurrence within 21 days
of his receipt of the relevant match card.
3.4 Penalties for ineligible players
3.4.1 If a team plays an ineligible player, then it is deemed to have defaulted on the board.
3.4.2 If an ineligible player plays on any board except the lowest, his/her playing will have caused players lower
in the team order to have played one board lower then they ought. A penalty shall therefore be deducted
and added to the opposing team's score. Penalties are calculated on the basis of the total score obtained
by the team on boards below the ineligible player, as follows:
Total score on lower boards
0 or ½ Penalty Nil
Total score on lower boards 1, 1½ or 2 Penalty ½
Total score on lower boards 2½ or 3 Penalty 1
(E.g. A team loses on boards 1 and 2, wins on board 3, and draws on board 4, but plays an ineligible player
on board 2. The total score on boards below the ineligible player is 1½, so the match score is adjusted by ½ penalty point, and the original 1½ - 2½ score becomes a 2 - 2 draw.)
3.4.3 If a team plays more than one ineligible player, then a separate penalty as above will be assessed in
respect of each such player.
4 Nominated players
4.1 Declaring nominations
Each club entering more than one team shall, at the beginning of the season, and before playing any
matches, submit a list of nominated players to the Fixtures Secretary. The Fixtures Secretary shall compile
a list of all nominated players and arrange for this to be posted on the league's website.
4.1.1 Each club entering two teams must nominate a minimum of its 3 strongest players for its 1st team.
4.1.2 Each club entering three or more teams must also nominate a minimum of its next 3 strongest players for
its 2nd team. If entering four or more teams the club must also nominate a minimum of its next 3 strongest
players for its 3rd team, and so on.
4.2 Restrictions on nominated players
4.2.1 A nominated player may not play for a team lower than the one for which he/she has been nominated.
4.2.2 Whether nominated or not, a player from a lower team may appear on a match score card 3 times for
higher teams while retaining eligibility to play for the lower team. Upon appearing on a match score
card a 4th time for any higher team the player becomes ineligible to play for the lower team.
4.3 New players
If a club acquires a new member during the season, then the club must advise the Tournament Controller
of that player's details in accordance with rule 3.1 within 7 days of his/her first appearance for one of its
teams. These details should be sufficient to establish with certainty whether the player is known to the
grading system, and should preferably comprise complete name (surname, forename, other initials), sex,
date of birth and ECF player code. If the player would have been nominated for a team had he/she been
available at the start of the season, then such a player may not play for a lower team. The Fixtures
Secretary shall amend the nominations for that club appropriately. If the Tournament Controller considers
that this rule has been clearly disregarded, he/she may treat such a player as ineligible, and apply the
provisions of rule 3.4.
4.4 Infrequent players
If a club elects not to nominate a player who is available only infrequently, then such a player may not
play for a team lower than that for which he/she would normally have been nominated. If the
Tournament Controller considers that this rule has been clearly disregarded, he/she may treat such a
player as ineligible, and apply the provisions of rule 3.4.
4.5 Nominated players in play-off matches
The only eligibility requirement for a play-off match is that a player must have played two or more times
for the team in that season.
5 Teams
5.1 Team size
Four-board matches shall be played in all divisions.
5.2 Team order
In each match, a team must play in descending order of current playing strength. It is recognised that,
for many reasons, a player's rating may not be the best guide to current form, and reasonable discretion
is allowed a team captain in this area. Nevertheless, for K-ratings players should play in order of
decreasing rating, subject to an allowable difference of 100 rating points*.
For P-ratings the Tournament Controller may require a team captain to justify his team order, and, should
he/she be satisfied that the provisions of this rule have been clearly disregarded to the detriment of the
opposing team, he/she shall refer the matter to the Management Committee who may adjust the match
result as seems appropriate.
Where * is the Official Revised Monthly Rating set by the ECF for each player.
5.3 Incomplete teams
If a team is unable to raise a full complement of players for a match, it must default on the bottom board or
boards. A team that attends a fixture with insufficient players to win it will be deemed to have defaulted the
match, and the conditions of rule 6.2 apply.
6 Defaults
6.1 Penalties for defaults
For a team defaulting boards in any match, "default penalty points" (dpts) shall be levied as follows: 4dpts –
board 1; 3dpts – board 2; ... 1dpt – board 4. For each 6 default penalty points accumulated in a season, one
match point shall be deducted.
6.2 Seriously defaulting teams
A team that postpones or rearranges a match other than in accordance with Rule 2.6 or has insufficient
players to win a match by the deadline established under 8.5 will be deemed to have defaulted it. In this
circumstance the following procedure shall apply.
6.2.1 The team shall have two match points deducted from its total.
6.2.2 The match shall be replayed at a date convenient to the team defaulted against. The team defaulted
against may also include any player who would have been eligible on the previously scheduled date. In
the event of disagreement a date for replaying the match shall be set by the Tournament Controller.
6.2.3 If the defaulting team does not replay the match it shall automatically be relegated and all its match results
declared void. (Games played by the defaulting team shall be graded as normal.)
7 Timings
7.1 Playing session
Unless otherwise agreed in reasonable advance of the night of the match to be longer, the playing session
shall be of duration of exactly 3 hours and 10 minutes.
7.2 Clocks
Digital clocks that permit the use of an increment must be used in all games and are expected to be
provided by the club hosting the match. The time controls specified below apply to all games in all
matches in all divisions.
7.3 Time controls
Subject to 7.1, all moves in 65 minutes plus a 30-second increment per move from move 1.
The Home team captain shall announce the time the match will start and the time (or, in accordance with
another suitable means of timing, how) the session will end. It shall be made clear which single clock or
device determines the end of the session.
If, following the end of the session, the players cannot agree a result the game shall be adjudicated [rule 9].
For guidance if considering a longer session clubs should be aware that games could last up to a
maximum total time (but only if both players use all their allocation) as shown:
| Minutes | Seconds | Move | Max Time |
| 65 | 30 | 60 | 03:10:00 |
| 65 | 30 | 70 | 03:20:00 |
| 65 | 30 | 80 | 03:30:00 |
| 65 | 30 | 90 | 03:40:00 |
| 65 | 30 | 100 | 03:50:00 |
7.4 Scoring
An accurate scoresheet must be maintained throughout the game.
8 The playing session
8.1 Laws of chess
The FIDE laws apply in general and the Management Committee will utilise the version produced by the
Chess Arbiters Association for interpretation of the various aspects of these laws in the context of the
League, except as set out in 8.1.1
8.1.1 Mobile phones, other communication devices, tablets and similar equipment are allowed in the playing
area. However they must be either switched off or switched to silent mode for the duration of the match.
Home team captains must remind players of this requirement. If a player's equipment makes any sound
during his game, then: On the first occurrence he will receive a warning. For a second offence by the
same player in the same game, the penalty is loss of the game.
8.2 Before play begins
The away team will have the White pieces on the odd numbered boards and Black on the even.
Immediately before a match, team captains shall: (1) exchange names of team players; (2) agree and
announce to all participants: (a) the time control, (b) the agreed finishing time, (c) any arrangements for
interruptions that could involve stopping clocks, and (d) the content of rule 8.1.1
8.3 Start of play
8.3.1 The home team should be ready to play by 7.30pm. An away team whose members are all present shall
be entitled to insist that the match commences at or after 7.30pm, even if the home team is incomplete,
with any member of the home club and start the clocks thereafter.
8.3.2 The away team should be ready to play by 7.45pm. The home team shall be entitled to insist that the
match commences at or after 7.45pm.
8.4 Missing clocks
If no clocks are available at 7.30pm, then time may be deducted from the home team's clocks. e.g. if clocks
are not ready for 10 minutes after the away team were ready to start the match, then the home teams will
have their available time reduced by 10 minutes.
8.5 Late players
If a player is not present by 8.30pm, or after 45 minutes after the start of his clock, whichever is the later,
and his team captain has no reserve available to take his place, then the game is lost by default.
8.6 Refreshments
The home team is normally expected to provide refreshments.
8.7 Mutually agreed changes to playing session.
If two teams agree to play at a time other than an evening, e.g. at a weekend, the match must be
played in accordance with Rule 7 except that, upon the agreement of both captains, the session may
be of unlimited duration.
9 Adjudication
9.1 Submitting games for adjudication
Team captains should make reasonable efforts in the eight days following a match to agree the results of
any unfinished games. If agreement on any such game cannot be reached, then each club must submit
the position and their claim to the Adjudication Secretary.
Detailed procedures for submitting an adjudication claim are here:
https://sites.google.com/site/sussexcca/adjudications
9.2 Notification of adjudicated results
The Adjudications Secretary will report adjudication results to both of the team captains involved.
9.3 Appeals against adjudicated results
If a club wishes to appeal against the result of an adjudication, then the team captain must, within 10 days
of receipt of the notification of adjudication, notify the Adjudications Secretary and the opposing captain of
his club's intention to appeal, and submit forthwith to the Adjudications Secretary.
10 Notification of results
10.1 Completion of results record
It is the home team captain's responsibility to arrange for the completion of an official result card or record
[including full initials of all players, the start time, and the length of the playing session] before the match,
signature by both captains after the match conclusion and its retention until completion of the season at the
AGM. If there are undecided games the submission of the result may be pended and, in accordance with
rule 9.1, any games subsequently sent for adjudication then marked with an 'A'.
10.2 Result submission
The home team captain must arrange for the final result to be submitted via the ECF League Management
System (LMS) as soon as possible, but in any case within ten days where rule 9.1 applies. In case of query,
the Tournament Controller may request to see the signed record and if not available, make a determination
of the match result.
11 League positions
11.1 Scoring system
League positions are determined as follows:
11.1.1 For each game in a match, a win shall count as 1 point and a draw as ½ a point.
11.1.2 The winning team will be that team which scores most game points, and thereby gains 2 match points. If
game points are equal, each team will score 1 match point.
11.1.3 League positions are determined by match point score. If two or more teams are level on match points,
they shall be placed in order according to the total number of game points they have scored in the
division.
11.2 Withdrawal of teams
If a team withdraws during the course of a season all results involving that team are scratched.
12 Additional matches
12.1 Play-off matches for first place
If two or more teams tie for top place in any division, there shall be a play-off if any team involved wishes it.
The teams may, however, agree to share the trophy.
12.2 Play-off matches for other places
If two or more teams tie for a promotion or relegation place, there shall be a play-off to resolve the issue. If
the two teams have already met in the competition that season then the venue shall be reversed for the
play-off.
12.3 Determination of the result in a play-off match
In the event of a drawn play-off match, if all games are drawn the match will be replayed at the away
team's venue, otherwise the result will be determined by board-count, and if the board-count is equal,
then by board- elimination.
12.3.1 Board-count
Each team totals the board numbers on which it has won and the team with the lower score wins the match.
12.3.2 Board-elimination
The result on the bottom board is eliminated and if the match is still drawn then the next board is eliminated
and so on until one team is winning on the remaining boards.
12.4 Champions v The Rest
At the start of each season, there shall be a match between the League Champions and a "Rest" side
selected by the Secretary from all other clubs.
13 Trophies & trophies
13.1 Trophies
The following trophies shall be presented at the AGM and held for one year:
13.1.1 Mowatt Cup – League Champions [Division 1 winners]
13.1.2 Gregory Cup – Division 2 winners
13.1.3 Division 3 Cup [older] – Division 3 winners
13.1.4 Division 4 Cup [newer] – Division 4 winners
13.2 Tankards
The following tankards shall be presented at the AGM and held for one year:
13.2.1 Best Match Average Tankard – The individual who, during the season, has the best percentage in all
League matches [excluding additional matches], having played in at least eight such matches. Any games
played between eligible and ineligible players are treated as defaults for the purposes of Best Match
Average calculation. If two or more players have equal best percentages the following tiebreaks apply:
i) most number of qualifying matches played, and if still equal then:
ii) highest number of wins, and if still equal then:
iii) the best individual winning game performance (opponent’s grade minus own grade); And
if still equal the trophy shall be shared.
13.2.2 Tankards will also be awarded to the player with the Best Match Average in each Division. To qualify, a
player must have played in at least three-quarters of any one of their team's matches in that Division but
their performance will be calculated on all their games played in that Division. If two or more players have
equal best percentages the tiebreaks as per 13.2.1 shall apply.
14 Meetings
14.1 Annual General Meeting
The Annual General Meeting of the League will be held in June each year. The Secretary shall circulate
the AGM agenda to clubs at least 14 days before the date of the meeting in order that clubs have time to
consider proposed rule changes. The business of the meeting shall include reports from league officers,
submission of annual accounts and election of officers for the forthcoming season, and may include
proposals for rule changes and consideration of other matters of concern to the league.
14.2 Extraordinary General Meeting
An Extraordinary General Meeting may be called at any time by the Chairman or Secretary, or at the
written request of six member clubs.
14.3 Voting at meetings
A club may be represented at any general meeting by one member for each team it had in the
league in the current season. A proxy is allowed such that one attendee may represent up to two teams
from the same club. All matters to be determined shall be decided by a simple majority of teams
represented.
15 Officers
15.1 Election of officers
The following league officers shall be elected at the AGM: Chairman, Secretary, Treasurer, Fixtures
Secretary, Tournament Controller, Knock-Out Tournament Controller and Auditor. With the exception of
the Auditor the officers will comprise the Management Committee.
15.2 Treasurer
The Treasurer shall present the accounts and balance sheet to the auditor by 30th April.
16 Interpretation and amendment of rules
16.1 Interpretation of the rules
Any matter not covered by these rules shall be determined by a majority decision of the Management
Committee, subject to the right of any involved club to appeal to the AGM or an EGM under rule 14.2.
16.2 Amendment of the rules
These rules may be amended only by the AGM or by an Extraordinary General Meeting called for that
purpose. If a rule change proposal has been rejected at an AGM, a substantially similar proposalmay not
be raised in the following year unless permission has been sought in advance and approved by leave of
the Management Committee.
Download KO Rules in PDF Format
Knock-Out Competition Rules Operative from September
2023
1. Entry shall be open to one or more teams of four
players from each club in the League. Teams wishing to enter shall inform the
Tournament Controller (TC) of their intention to do so not later than 14th
September. It is a condition of entry that each team nominates a team captain,
and submits his/her contact details.
2. The TC shall be appointed by the league. The TC
shall be responsible for maintaining the competition as both a smooth-running
and an amicable event, and he/she shall be accorded reasonable discretion in
the interpretation of these rules to further these ends.
3. The TC shall draw up a pairing tree for the
entire competition. Random means shall be used to allocate teams to their
initial positions in the tree. Apart from matches postponed from agreed dates
by severe weather, any preliminary round matches must be played by 30th
October, quarter finals by 15th December, semi-finals by 28th February and the
final by 30th April. The pairing tree, the schedule for the completion of the
rounds, and a list of the contact details for all team captains shall be sent
to all clubs by 1st October.
4. If it is the first match for both teams then the
team placed higher in the pairing tree shall play at home. Thereafter the venue
shall be determined in order that teams play alternately home and away and to
avoid where possible the difference between home and away games for either team
being two or higher. Where teams have equal past patterns the team that appears
higher in the pairing tree shall alternate.
5. Captains should strive to keep themselves
informed of the outcome of matches in collateral branches of the pairing tree,
and to make arrangements for the following round at the earliest opportunity.
Nevertheless, the TC shall contact captains of victorious teams to inform them
of their next opponents. It is then the responsibility of the captain of the
home team to contact the captain of the away team within 7 days, and offer at
least two dates on which the match can be played within the schedule.
6. Once a player has played in this competition,
that player may not subsequently play for another team in this competition in
the same season.
7. For the purposes of this competition a player's rating
shall be their official ECF standardplay rating from the current month’s rating
list.
Captains shall ensure they use the
up-to-date list available on the ECF website for all matches. If a player's
only rating is a rapidplay rating this shall be used. No player shall appear
who does not have a current ECF rating or an estimated rating as determined in
advance by the TC (any player who does will be deemed ineligible). The club
shall provide to the TC all relevant information concerning an unrated player's
strength. This must include, but shall not be limited to, all or any available
of the following:
a. previous ECF rating(s) / grade(s) with date(s);
b. current or previous FIDE rating(s) with date(s);
c. current or previous national rating(s) with
date(s);
d. recent tournament and league appearances with
date(s). In estimating a rating the TC may take into consideration any other
relevant information not provided.
8. Each team shall total the ratings of the players
actually playing in a match, excluding any player winning or losing by default.
9.
The match shall be handicapped according to the
following table:
| Difference in Total Rating | To Win, higher-rated team must score |
| 0 - 179 | No handicap and a 2 - 2 draw resolved first by board count and second by board elimination |
| 180 - 559 | The higher rated team must score 2.5 to win and a 2 - 2 result shall count as a win for the lower rated team |
| 560 - 999 | The higher rated team must score 3 to win |
| 1000+ | The higher rated team must score 3.5 to win |
10. If the difference between the total ratings of
the teams is less than 180, a level match shall be played, with a 2 - 2 draw
being resolved by board count, and, if the board count is equal, by board
elimination.
Board count:
Each team totals the numbers on the
boards which it won, and the team with the lower count wins the match. E.g.
Team A wins on boards 1 and 4; team B wins on boards 3 and 5; board 2 is drawn.
A has a board count of 1 + 4 = 5; B has a board count of 3 + 5 = 8; A has the
lower count and wins the match.
Board elimination:
The score on the bottom board is
eliminated, and if the result is still a draw, board 3 is eliminated and then
board 2.
In the event of all games in the match being drawn, the
match will be won by the team with the lowest average ECF rating.
11. The
rate of play shall be all moves in 80 minutes with a 10 second increment per
move from move 1. No scoring is required by a player once less than five
minutes has appeared on that player's clock.
12. All relevant rules of the League apply to this
competition, except the following:
a. Read Tournament Controller instead of Fixtures
Secretary.
b. Section 6 (Defaults) shall not apply. A
defaulting team, whether Home or Away, is eliminated from the competition.
c. If a League player's club does not enter a team
they may play for another club's KO team irrespective of League rule 3.2.
13. Results (including the computation of handicaps)
shall be submitted by the captain of the winning team via the ECF League
Management System (LMS) within 2 days of completing the match.
Sussex County Chess Association [SCCA]
Adjudication procedure
Download Adjudication form in Word Format or Editable PDF
1. Any position submitted for adjudication must reach the Adjudication Secretary within 10 days of the playing of the match. If the position is received after the 10 days then the player's claim will be disallowed.
2. e-mail or First class post must be used in all communication.
If using post, the position will not be accepted as accurate and complete in any of the following circumstances;
there is no cheque or it is incorrectly completed
there is an error or omission in the claim or the position.
If using email and
your claim is not successful, you undertake to pay the fee within 7
days of the decision. Failure to do so will result in the deduction of
one match point from the team.
3. The fees, which are returnable if the claim is upheld,
are £5 per position submitted, and an additional £10 for appeals. Cheques to be payable to Sussex County Chess Association. Alternatively,
banking details are available upon request, for Bacs payment if
preferred. Please, leave identification with payment to enable determination of payee e.g. [Adjudication and club name].
4. Positions submitted must:
contain only the claim of the submitter and not that of the opponent;
follow the normal conventions, e.g. White at the bottom and Black at the top of the diagram.
where relevant, indicate whether castling is possible or an 'en passant' capture can be played.
5. An appeal procedure is available where the adjudicator gives a decision different to that claimed by the player. Under this procedure the player has the right to appeal the decision. To do so, the player or the club's Match Captain must:
lodge the appeal with the Adjudications Secretary within 10 days of the date of receipt of the disputed decision;
submit three copies of the detailed analysis to support the appeal; and
provide within the same 10 days one copy of the appeal analysis to the opposing team's Match Captain
NEW
email may be used for appeals [within 10 days of the receipt of the disputed decision].
only one copy of the detailed analysis need be to send to the secretary.
one copy to the opposing team's Match Captain
and an undertaking to pay the £10 fee if the appeal is unsuccessful
Within 7 days of receipt of the appeal analysis the Match Captain of the appellant's opposing team is either to:
submit three copies [ or one copy if by email] of any comments/analysis thereon to the Adjudication Secretary; or
inform the Adjudications Secretary that no comments/analysis will be submitted
Adjudication Secretary
Paul Batchelor 98 Mackie Avenue, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 8RD
01273 508128
P.Batchelor@outlook.com