SEASON 2022-23

AGM Minutes 28th June 2022

Attendees 
Doug Stevenson – Eastbourne – Chair     
Peter Farr – Argumentatives- Fixtures 
Richard Welford – Lewes                              
Alex Taylor – Horsham / Collyers 
Jim Wheeler – Hastings                                  
Robert Wall – East Grinstead 
Mark Attree –Uckfield -  Secretary            
David Fryer – Crowborough 
Luke Rutherford – Brighton and Hove     
Paul Batchelor- Brighton and Hove 
Chris Jones – Worthing                                  
Peter Larwood - Worthing 

1. Chairman’s Opening Remarks and Apologies for Absence 
Doug Stevenson (DS) welcomed attendees to the meeting.  Apologies had been received prior to the meeting from John Pye, East Grinstead Bookshop and Brian Stockham, Uckfield. 

2. Minutes of Last Year’s AGM 
The Minutes were approved without comment.  

3. Secretary’s Report and Matters Arising 
Currently the location of the Rapidplay Trophy is unknown.  Clubs are asked to confirm the trophies that are in their possession. 

4. Treasurers Report and Matters Arising 
Doug Stevenson re-presented the accounts from 19-20, there had been little recent activity.  HSBC had cancelled the MSCL account (in common with many clubs and societies) which has led to clubs not being able to pay their membership fees. Opinion was sought on the best way to handle this.  Peter Larwood explained that Worthing had successfully transferred to NatWest and that it should be quite easy for the League to do the same. It may be necessary to accept only one signatory on payments. DS as Treasurer to investigate. It was proposed that annual fees remain the same for next season as major expense on Trophies could be delayed for two further years. A discussion regarding the nature of the League took place here, reported under 11 Rule Changes where it is more pertinent.    

5. Fixture Secretary’s Report and Matters Arising 
Peter Farr informed the meeting that sixteen teams in two divisions had taken part in the 2022 League season and thanked team captains for their flexibility in re-arranging fixtures when they had been affected by covid.  There had been no board defaults in the adult league.  The Knockout competition had not taken place. 
Division 1 – 1st  Brighton and Hove, 2nd Horsham, 
Division 2 -  1st Crowborough, 2nd Bexhill 
Rapidplay Division – 1st Crowborough 

6. Tournament Controllers Report and Matters Arising 
There had been no disputes or controversies requiring intervention.  Due to the ECF moving to ratings the application of ratings for the Knockout needs to be considered, Peter Farr to adjust the rules accordingly. 

7. Presentation of Trophies 
Division 1 Trophy was received by Paul Batchelor of Brighton and Hove. 
Division 2 Trophy was received by David Fryer of Crowborough 
Rapidplay Division Trophy was not available for presentation. 
The tankards for Overall performance, Division 1 and Division 2 were presented.  
Due to the shorter than normal season the Committee had deemed it fairer to award the tankards for the best performance slightly outside the parameters in the rules (75% of games required) as this meant awarding to players who had achieved 5 out of 5 rather than 5 out of 6. 
Overall Tankard was received by Luke Rutherford of Brighton and Hove 
Division 1 Tankard was received by Luke Rutherford of Brighton and Hove 
Division 2 tankard was received by David Fryer of Crowborough on behalf of the winner, Henry Shaw. 

8. Election of Officers 
Current officers were re-elected on a show of hands.  David Fryer was elected to the post of Webmaster and updated the meeting on progress to update the website, which is in the process of being re-located to share the hosting used by Crowborough Chess Club. A small decrease in cost was anticipated. It was commented that the website passwords etc. should be known by more than one person going forwards to avoid the circumstance where the League was unable to access it’s own website for some reason.  

9.  County Adjudication Secretary’s Report and Matters Arising 
Nothing to report. 

10. SCCA Matters relating to the League (and ECF) 
Luke Rutherford updated the meeting.  The SCCA is considering holding an AGM in August (if possible).  Currently there is no Secretary or President and the SCCA is running only one team, in the ‘Open’ Section in county matches.  It was suggested that as David Fryer was updating the MSCL website that he could add a page for SCCA matters. Peter Farr stated that the ECF was changing it’s membership date, such that players could join at any time and would then receive a full years membership. 

11a. Proposed Rule Change – Team Size 
Proposal (Eastbourne)                   
Rule 5.1 Team Size Currently  - Five-board matches shall be played in all divisions
Proposed – Four-board matches shall be played in all divisions Discussion centred on the reason for changing to 4-board teams (as in the just completed season).  
The proposal was considered to make travel to away matches simpler as it would allow a less crowded car and would allow a non-playing driver if required.  
David Fryer, in favour of 4-player teams stated that this was very useful for the Rapidplay League.  
Some clubs suggested 4 player teams (eg Worthing) might allow them to enter more teams, because of the reluctance to travel in a crowded car and therefor a lack of drivers, whilst other clubs eg Horsham believed that it would most likely lead to fewer players taking part, particularly if the lack of drivers was an issue.  
Robert Wall believed that East Grinstead could possibly enter 2 teams of 4, but only one of 5.  Uckfield could only enter one team whether it was of 4 or 5. 
Alternatives were proposed, Peter Larwood suggested a hybrid on-line / otb league, by agreeement between teams.  In this way avoiding the longer trips between clubs.  
There was a consensus that this may not be practical, the potential for cheating being a concern.  
The rules currently allow fixtures to be held at weekends and at a mid-way venue so overall it was considered that there was already sufficient flexibility to allow the League to continue as before.  Peter Farr offered to run an on-line league in parallel if it was not to the detriment of the otb League. 
Given the debate there was a general reluctance to implement a rule that could not be reversed at the next AGM and Doug Stevenson proposed an amendment that the proposed rule change should relate only to season 22-23.  This amendment was approved.  
The meeting then voted on the proposed amended rule and this was approved 12 votes to 5.
Various knock-on alterations to the rules will be required to account for this change (eg in the Knockout Trophy) and the Committee undertook to make these changes. 

Rule 5.1 Team Size                   
Currently  - Five-board matches shall be played in all divisions
Changed to – Five-board matches shall normally be played in all divisions, but for season 2022-23 four-board matches shall be played in all divisions.   

11b. Proposed Rule Change – Proxy Voting                    
Rule 14.3  Voting at Meetings
Currently - A club may be represented at any general meeting by one member for each team it had in the league in the current season. All matters to be determined shall be decided by a simple majority of such representatives who are present and voting.  
Proposed - A club may be represented at any general meeting by one member for each team it had in the league in the current season.  A proxy is allowed such that one attendee may represent up to two teams from the same club.  All matters to be determined shall be decided by a simple majority of teams represented. 
There were two strands to this debate; what constituted the most democratic system and what led to a better discussion at the meeting.  
One club one vote was considered overall not to reflect the number of players represented by each club whilst the drawback of clubs bussing in numbers of members to the meeting to vote on something contentious was not seen as being either sensible or conducive to a good discussion. 
It was suggested that although the proposal benefitted the larger clubs at the expense of the smaller it was agreed that this was a reasonable compromise - passed with 2 against.   

12. Any Other Business None Meeting closed at 10.00 pm.  

Minutes Seconds Move Max Time
65 30 60 03:10:00
65 30 70 03:20:00
65 30 80 03:30:00
65 30 90 03:40:00
65 30 100 03:50:00

KO Rules 2022-3

Download KO Rules in PDF Format
Knock-Out Competition Rules Operative from September 2022


1. Entry shall be open to one or more teams of four players from each club in the League. Teams wishing to enter shall inform the Tournament Controller (TC) of their intention to do so not later than 14th September. It is a condition of entry that each team nominates a team captain, and submits his/her contact details.

2. The TC shall be appointed by the league. The TC shall be responsible for maintaining the competition as both a smooth-running and an amicable event, and he/she shall be accorded reasonable discretion in the interpretation of these rules to further these ends.

3. The TC shall draw up a pairing tree for the entire competition. Random means shall be used to allocate teams to their initial positions in the tree. Apart from matches postponed from agreed dates by severe weather, any preliminary round matches must be played by 30th October, quarter finals by 15th December, semi-finals by 28th February and the final by 30th April. The pairing tree, the schedule for the completion of the rounds, and a list of the contact details for all team captains shall be sent to all clubs by 1st October.

4. If it is the first match for both teams then the team placed higher in the pairing tree shall play at home. Thereafter the venue shall be determined in order that teams play alternately home and away and to avoid where possible the difference between home and away games for either team being two or higher. Where teams have equal past patterns the team that appears higher in the pairing tree shall alternate.

5. Captains should strive to keep themselves informed of the outcome of matches in collateral branches of the pairing tree, and to make arrangements for the following round at the earliest opportunity. Nevertheless, the TC shall contact captains of victorious teams to inform them of their next opponents. It is then the responsibility of the captain of the home team to contact the captain of the away team within 7 days, and offer at least two dates on which the match can be played within the schedule.

6. Once a player has played in this competition, that player may not subsequently play for another team in this competition in the same season.

7. For the purposes of this competition a player's rating shall be their official ECF standardplay rating from the current month’s rating list.
Captains shall ensure they use the up-to-date list available on the ECF website for all matches. If a player's only rating is a rapidplay rating this shall be used. No player shall appear who does not have a current ECF rating or an estimated rating as determined in advance by the TC (any player who does will be deemed ineligible). The club shall provide to the TC all relevant information concerning an unrated player's strength. This must include, but shall not be limited to, all or any available of the following:

a. previous ECF rating(s) / grade(s) with date(s);
b. current or previous FIDE rating(s) with date(s);
c. current or previous national rating(s) with date(s);
d. recent tournament and league appearances with date(s). In estimating a rating the TC may take into consideration any other relevant information not provided.

8. Each team shall total the ratings of the players actually playing in a match, excluding any player winning or losing by default.

9.
The match shall be handicapped according to the following table:

Difference in Total Rating To Win, higher-rated team must score
0 - 179 No handicap and a 2 - 2 draw resolved first by board count and second by board elimination
180 - 559 The higher rated team must score 2.5 to win and a 2 - 2 result shall count as a win for the lower rated team
560 - 999 The higher rated team must score 3 to win
1000+ The higher rated team must score 3.5 to win

10. If the difference between the total ratings of the teams is less than 180, a level match shall be played, with a 2 - 2 draw being resolved by board count, and, if the board count is equal, by board elimination.   

Board count:
 
Each team totals the numbers on the boards which it won, and the team with the lower count wins the match. E.g. Team A wins on boards 1 and 4; team B wins on boards 3 and 5; board 2 is drawn. A has a board count of 1 + 4 = 5; B has a board count of 3 + 5 = 8; A has the lower count and wins the match. 

Board elimination: 
The score on the bottom board is eliminated, and if the result is still a draw, board 3 is eliminated and then board 2. 

In the event of all games in the match being drawn, the match will be won by the team with the lowest average ECF rating. 

11. The rate of play shall be all moves in 80 minutes with a 10 second increment per move from move 1. No scoring is required by a player once less than five minutes has appeared on that player's clock. 

12. All relevant rules of the League apply to this competition, except the following: 
  a. Read Tournament Controller instead of Fixtures Secretary. 
  b. Section 6 (Defaults) shall not apply. A defaulting team, whether Home or Away, is eliminated from the competition. 
  c. If a League player's club does not enter a team they may play for another club's KO team irrespective of League rule 3.2. 

13. Results (including the computation of handicaps) shall be submitted by the captain of the winning team via the ECF League Management System (LMS) within 2 days of completing the match.